A focused review where the main concern is exposure: policy gaps, shadow use, data handling risk,
and loss of control.
Method: where useful, the review is informed by recognised governance and ethics reference points including the
NIST AI Risk Management Framework, the GOV.UK Data and AI Ethics Framework, the UK’s cross-sector AI regulatory
principles, ICO guidance, and standards or principles such as ISO/IEC 42001, ISO/IEC 23894, and the OECD AI
Principles.
This is an advisory review informed by these reference points, not a formal standards assessment, legal opinion,
compliance certification, or regulatory sign-off.
Price guide: from £1,250 ex VAT (scoped quote after pre-work)
7-10 working days30-60 mins stakeholder time1-2 short stakeholder sessions
Who it is for
AI is already happening and control feels unclear
IG or governance concerns need rapid clarity
Teams needing defensible options for leadership decisions
Not the right fit if
You are at very early stage with no confirmed AI activity
You need a full strategic readiness roadmap across many areas
You are looking for certification or formal compliance sign-off
Problems this solves
Before
Policy exists but day-to-day behaviour drifts
Shadow AI and third-party usage are hard to see
Leaders cannot judge whether controls are proportionate
After
Reality check of behaviour vs policy
Risk posture and immediate control gaps made explicit
Minimum / sensible / stronger options with trade-offs
What is included
Focused document and context review
Reality check: behaviour versus written policy
Immediate gap view and short-term risk priorities
Defensible control options: minimum, sensible, stronger
Process and timeline
Step 1: Pre-work and relevant policy/process docs collected.
Step 2: One to two short stakeholder sessions focused on real behaviour.
Step 3: Gap analysis and risk posture drafted.
Step 4: Defensible options delivered for decision.
Typical turnaround: 7-10 working days from completed pre-work.
Your time required: 30-60 mins stakeholder time plus questionnaire and relevant policy/process docs.
Service-specific FAQ
Do you assess actual behaviour or just policy documents?
Both. The review checks behaviour versus policy so leadership can see where practical use sits outside agreed controls.
What do minimum / sensible / stronger options mean?
They are tiered control sets so you can choose a governance level matched to risk appetite, urgency, and available capacity.
Can you work with our existing governance instead of replacing it?
Yes. This service is designed to tighten existing arrangements, not force a full reset.
How quickly can we start if concerns are urgent?
Because scope is focused, delivery is usually 7-10 working days from completed pre-work and document access.
What outputs can we use with leadership or compliance teams?
You receive a clear risk posture summary, immediate gap view, and defensible options to support leadership and compliance discussions.